Skip to content
Menu
  • News
  • Rugby
  • Old Skool shoes
  • limerick gaa jerseys
  • f1 t shirt
oumea.com

EU caps “bad” biofuels

Posted on March 3, 2020

EU caps “bad” biofuels

The European Parliament retreats on its policy of supporting biofuels after rising concern about its negative social and environmental impact.

By
Dave Keating

4/28/15, 4:52 PM CET

Updated 6/2/15, 9:54 AM CET

Turning plants into fuel seems like the ultimate in green, but in reality it has been much more problematic, blamed for increasing food prices, causing conflicts over land use around the world and even contributing to climate change — which is why the EU is backtracking on its support for biofuels.

The European Parliament on Tuesday agreed to cap the use of traditional biofuels that can be used to meet EU renewable targets at no more than 7 percent of transport energy. Such ‘first-generation’ biofuel comes from crops like palm oil, rapeseed, sugar cane and soy specifically grown to be turned into biodiesel.

The EU was originally very enthusiastic about the idea, setting a target in 2008 to source 10 percent of all transport fuel from renewable sources by 2020. This target drove EU states to put in place incentives for biofuels, which spurred rapid growth in the sector.

But campaigners said the incentives displaced food crops, caused inappropriate land use and raised food prices by motivating farmers in the developing world to raze fields to meet European demand;  Europe is the world’s largest importer and user of biodiesel. Growing biofuel also results in more carbon emissions than are actually saved by use of these alternative fuels.

There were plenty of warnings even when the EU’s biofuel policy was put into place. A 2008 report from the European Environment Agency, an EU advisory body, warned that the expansion of biofuels “may cause adverse effects on the environment” that could “jeopardize the achievement of other environmental goals.” As time went on, the evidence for environmental harm caused by biofuels kept growing, but it took years to persuade the European Commission to change.

For the EU, it is an embarrassing retreat from a policy that was originally touted as the ‘great green hope’ for lowering transport emissions. The hope is that the change will encourage development of less problematic advanced biofuels derived from straw and household and farm waste.

Even that retreat wasn’t enough for some campaigners. Many green and center-left MEPs had wanted much stronger rules — with a 6 percent cap and a methodology to quantify indirect land use changes. They also wanted a minimum target for advanced biofuels. First-generation biofuels currently makes up about 5 percent of the fuels used to meet the EU’s renewable energy target, which means their use can still go up by 2020.

Dutch MEP Bas Eickhout, who worked on the file for the Green group, said the legislation “falls far short of what is required to address the myriad of problems with the EU’s biofuel policy.”

“This legislation was supposed to ensure the EU does not continue to promote biofuels that exacerbates climate change and has a negative social impact but what has been agreed and voted today will not do so,” he said.

But the traditional biofuels industry lobbied hard against introducing the methodology. Member states insisted on a more restrained change, and they were backed by center-right MEPs.

Makers of advanced biofuels also expressed disappointment at the lack of binding incentives for their products. “The final compromise is lacking ambition and fails to provide the certainty and direction needed for the sector,” said Thomas Nagy, executive vice-president of Novozymes, a Danish biotech company.

But environmental campaigners conceded that a deal was better than nothing. “This decision by the EU was long overdue,” said Faustine Defossez of the European Environmental Bureau. “The big question now is whether the EU has learned from its mistake of promoting biofuel despite concerns about its sustainability.”

With the biofuels file finally closed, environmental campaigners are turning their attention to bioenergy used outside the transport sector — for heating, cooling and electricity.

A coalition of NGOs including WWF, ActionAid, Greenpeace and Oxfam released a set of recommendations for the EU to adjust its non-transport bioenergy policy. Existing incentives in the EU’s renewable energy legislation mean that the use of bioenergy is growing, and three-quarters of this comes from forestry.

The Commission’s energy union strategy, published in February, promised a new policy for sustainable biomass by 2017. The NGOs want this legislation to introduce a cap to limit the use of biomass for energy to levels that can be sustainably supplied, and introduce a methodology for accounting the carbon emissions of land use change from biomass.

Campaigners are pressing the point that, given the experience with transport biofuels, the Commission would be wise to fully consider future side-effects when designing its new rules.

Watch the press conference with Finnish liberal MEP Nils Torvild, who steered the legislation through the European Parliament:

Authors:
Dave Keating 

Click Here: ADELAIDE CROWS 2019 MEN’S HOME GUERNSEY

Recent Posts

  • Rain Gauge: Measuring Precipitation for Weather and Climate Studies
  • Rain Gauge: A Comprehensive Overview of Its Design and Functionality
  • **How Is Dew Point Calculated**
  • How is Dew Point Calculated?
  • How is Dew Point Calculated?

Recent Comments

    Archives

    • April 2025
    • March 2025
    • February 2025
    • January 2025
    • December 2024
    • November 2024
    • February 2023
    • January 2023
    • December 2022
    • November 2022
    • October 2022
    • September 2022
    • August 2022
    • July 2022
    • June 2022
    • May 2022
    • April 2022
    • March 2022
    • February 2022
    • January 2022
    • December 2021
    • October 2021
    • September 2021
    • August 2021
    • July 2021
    • June 2021
    • May 2021
    • April 2021
    • March 2021
    • February 2021
    • January 2021
    • December 2020
    • November 2020
    • October 2020
    • September 2020
    • August 2020
    • July 2020
    • June 2020
    • May 2020
    • April 2020
    • March 2020
    • February 2020
    • January 2020
    • December 2019
    • November 2019
    • October 2019
    • September 2019
    • August 2019
    • July 2019
    • June 2019
    • May 2019
    • April 2019
    • March 2019

    Categories

    • News
    • Rugby

    Meta

    • Log in
    • Entries feed
    • Comments feed
    • WordPress.org
    ©2025 oumea.com | WordPress Theme by Superbthemes.com