Skip to content
Menu
  • News
  • Rugby
  • Old Skool shoes
  • limerick gaa jerseys
  • f1 t shirt
oumea.com

California disputes Canadian claims on tar-sands emissions

Posted on March 19, 2020

California disputes Canadian claims on tar-sands emissions

US state defends its environmental standards.

European Voice

By
Dave Keating

12/7/11, 10:17 PM CET

Updated 4/12/14, 10:22 PM CET

California’s environmental protection agency has written to the European Commission and EU member states rejecting claims from Canada about greenhouse-gas emissions from tar sands.

In October, the Commission proposed an addition to the fuel-quality directive, a higher emissions value for oil from tar sands than for other sources of fossil fuel because of its overall life-cycle impact. The decision, strongly opposed by Canada, which is rich in tar sands, must now be approved by member states.

California is the only US state that has a greenhouse-gas standard that takes into account emissions during a fuel’s life-cycle, the low-carbon fuel standard. According to a UK government official, Canadian trade representatives have been telling EU member states that this standard has failed because it is impossible to implement.

But in the letter to EU and national officials, seen by European Voice, Mary Nichols, the chairwoman of California’s Air Resource Board, said: “The principle of accounting for life-cycle greenhouse-gas emissions, including those associated with production and transport of crude oil, continues to be an important feature of the low-carbon fuel standard.”

She said that, although the board is working on refinements to the low-carbon fuel standard, any suggestions that it is preparing to abandon its current approach are false.

Canadian trade representatives have also said that the standard presents a high administrative burden, but this is denied in Nichols’ letter. “Oil companies already track and report their crude oil information as a normal course of business,” she wrote. “Any additional production-related reporting going forward would be no more burdensome than those currently placed on low-carbon fuel providers.”

Canada’s position

Chris Davies, a UK Liberal MEP, said that although it would be “extraordinarily naive” for ministers to believe the Canadian government’s assertions about California’s environmental laws, he suspects the UK government is being won over.

“The UK is among those that seem to have fallen for the misinformation being put about by Canadian lobbyists,” he said, accusing Canada of pursuing “a policy of delay and obfuscation”.

The Canadian government did not respond to requests for comment.

The Commission has proposed a greenhouse-gas emissions value for oil from tar sands of 107 grams of CO2 per megajoule of energy produced. The default value for conventional crude oil is 87.5g CO2/mj.

The fuel-quality directive requires fuel suppliers to reduce the carbon footprint of fuel by 6% over the next ten years.

The EU imports very little oil from tar sands directly from Canada, but the Canadian government fears that assigning a high value to oil from tar sands might put off other buyers of its oil.

Higher emissions

Proponents of Canadian tar sands say the fuel produces only 5%-15% more greenhouse-gas emissions than the average crude oil consumed in the US, citing a study by HIS-Cambridge Energy Research Associates, a research firm. They say these marginal extra emissions are balanced by Canada having more stringent regulation and a better human-rights record than other oil producers, such as Saudi Arabia, and that Canadian producers are reducing the carbon footprint of tar sands.

But other studies have put emissions at between 18%-49% higher than oil consumed in the EU, and have said that the emissions reduction potential has reached its technological limit.

Authors:
Dave Keating 

Click Here: pinko shop cheap

Recent Posts

  • Rain Gauge: Measuring Precipitation for Weather and Climate Studies
  • Rain Gauge: A Comprehensive Overview of Its Design and Functionality
  • **How Is Dew Point Calculated**
  • How is Dew Point Calculated?
  • How is Dew Point Calculated?

Recent Comments

    Archives

    • April 2025
    • March 2025
    • February 2025
    • January 2025
    • December 2024
    • November 2024
    • February 2023
    • January 2023
    • December 2022
    • November 2022
    • October 2022
    • September 2022
    • August 2022
    • July 2022
    • June 2022
    • May 2022
    • April 2022
    • March 2022
    • February 2022
    • January 2022
    • December 2021
    • October 2021
    • September 2021
    • August 2021
    • July 2021
    • June 2021
    • May 2021
    • April 2021
    • March 2021
    • February 2021
    • January 2021
    • December 2020
    • November 2020
    • October 2020
    • September 2020
    • August 2020
    • July 2020
    • June 2020
    • May 2020
    • April 2020
    • March 2020
    • February 2020
    • January 2020
    • December 2019
    • November 2019
    • October 2019
    • September 2019
    • August 2019
    • July 2019
    • June 2019
    • May 2019
    • April 2019
    • March 2019

    Categories

    • News
    • Rugby

    Meta

    • Log in
    • Entries feed
    • Comments feed
    • WordPress.org
    ©2025 oumea.com | WordPress Theme by Superbthemes.com