Skip to content
Menu
  • News
  • Rugby
  • Old Skool shoes
  • limerick gaa jerseys
  • f1 t shirt
oumea.com

‘I see myself in them’: the documentary that humanizes sex workers

Posted on April 12, 2019

“You can’t just walk away,” says Kandie, as she describes the reality of what it’s like to leave a pimp. “There is no just walking away.” In walking away and leaving her exploiter behind, she “blew up”, a phrase used by Emmy nominated film-maker Stephanie Wang-Breal in her new documentary Blowin’ Up. In it, she spotlights the stories of women working in the sex industry with the groundbreaking court they enter after being arrested: Queens human trafficking intervention court.

“There are so many films that have been made about prostitution and I think that there’s a stereotypical narrative that goes with that kind of film-making,” Wang-Breal said to the Guardian. “I definitely did not want to do that.”

By focusing on the aforementioned court (the first problem-solving court focused on prostitution created in the US) and the judge who presides over it, Toko Serita, Blowin’ Up does offer a unique narrative.

Coming together over the course of two years, the film emphasizes the subtleties of human trafficking: the coercion, the manipulation and the vast variety of reasons why women enter into illegal sex work. Kandie fell in because she needed money for her boyfriend’s cash bail and another found herself working at a massage parlor because she wanted to pay off a debt. No story is similar, and this is intentional. “I really wanted to give them a chance to show their perspective on their lives,” Wang-Breal said. “I think that’s one of the powers of this film.”

The film forgives where so many depictions do not, allowing the audience to see the girls for what they are: girls. Avoiding dehumanizing cliches, instead we’re presented with the minutiae of their day-to-day lives as well as court proceedings that prioritise authenticity over construction. “When people think about the criminal justice system, they think of it as a highly procedural, nonhuman place full of men,” Wang-Breal said. “This room is the paradox of that. It’s full of humanity, full of laughter, full of women.” Other than the bailiffs and the occasional translator, no man has a speaking part in the film.

It’s this femininity that drew Wang-Breal to the court to begin with. She first happened upon it in a newspaper profile and was drawn to its unconventional style and characters. “It was a courtroom that was run by women and on top of it, it was a courtroom that was run by women of color,” said Wang-Breal.

Serita initially refused the idea of her involvement. “I laughed!” she said to the Guardian. “I said: ‘Sure, go ahead. You can film in the courtroom, but not with me!’” She confessed it took nearly a year to gain her approval, but her trust in Wang-Breal comes alive onscreen, as do the profound connections between defendants and the administrators of the court. “In the hands of someone else, God knows what it would have looked like on the screen!” she adds.

Like the collaboration of Serita and Wang-Breal, the court takes a similar altruistic approach to the defendants, trying to serve those that appear in it. “What we try to do is engage in harm reduction and to try to figure out what the needs are of the various women that we serve,” Serita said, making those who help in the court so necessary. “I could not see the court functioning effectively without the participation and involvement of these various service provider organizations. They’re the ones that do the hard work of connecting with these women, of developing relationships with them, working with them, etc. The court really relies on their participation.”

But previous victims weren’t so lucky. Prior to the opening of the court, Serita describes a grimmer picture of the defendants. “They were treated in a very, very dehumanizing manner, and no one was recognizing the degree of trauma,” she said. “The reason why this court was created was really to right a wrong, to address the contradictions in the legal system in terms of further punishing what we knew to be individuals who were being exploited and victimized in the commercial sex trade.”

Throughout the duration of Blowin’ Up, we see the court becoming more progressive. “It became the human trafficking intervention court as a way to place emphasis on the fact that there were trafficking victims in the court system that were not being recognized as such,” Serita said. There, the victims are not forced into a revolving door system of the street to prison pipeline and instead, they’re given alternatives to help get away from it through service programs that provide opportunities for rehabilitation.

There’s a concern in the film that the system might regress when, after the 2016 election, immigration was made a headline issue. Wang-Breal speculates had they begun filming after the inauguration of Donald Trump, the entire film might not have come to be. “I think that if the filming had taken place later we wouldn’t have had anyone really willing to participate in the filming because the risk and dangers of participating in a project like this would have been even greater,” she says. Serita is more optimistic. While she admits that around four or five people have been detained by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (Ice) after leaving the court, it hasn’t completely deterred defendants from coming in the first place.

Blowin’ Up champions collaboration, whether it be behind the camera or in court. Wang-Breal declares that it is the strength of the film. “One of the things that I love about my job as a director is that I get invited into these people’s homes, into these people’s lives, into these people’s stories through my work,” she said. “For me, I look at my film-making process as a collaborative process.”

In the film, all of the defendants, the service providers, prosecutors and Serita all take a hand in doing so for the greater good, acknowledging that help is the first step. Susan Liu, a service provider of the Garden of Hope, says in the film: “I see myself in them. Somehow, I feel like we are the same. I mean, I pray a lot and I feel like my prayers, many of the requests I make to God are the same requests of the women, their wishes when they tell me in session. ‘[I want] somebody to love me, somebody who will never abandon me, somewhere safe, stable housing.’ Basic, basic things like in normal people’s lives. They just want that! And I want that too. Every person wants that.”

  • Blowin’ Up is out in the US now

Recent Posts

  • Rain Gauge: Measuring Precipitation for Weather and Climate Studies
  • Rain Gauge: A Comprehensive Overview of Its Design and Functionality
  • **How Is Dew Point Calculated**
  • How is Dew Point Calculated?
  • How is Dew Point Calculated?

Recent Comments

    Archives

    • April 2025
    • March 2025
    • February 2025
    • January 2025
    • December 2024
    • November 2024
    • February 2023
    • January 2023
    • December 2022
    • November 2022
    • October 2022
    • September 2022
    • August 2022
    • July 2022
    • June 2022
    • May 2022
    • April 2022
    • March 2022
    • February 2022
    • January 2022
    • December 2021
    • October 2021
    • September 2021
    • August 2021
    • July 2021
    • June 2021
    • May 2021
    • April 2021
    • March 2021
    • February 2021
    • January 2021
    • December 2020
    • November 2020
    • October 2020
    • September 2020
    • August 2020
    • July 2020
    • June 2020
    • May 2020
    • April 2020
    • March 2020
    • February 2020
    • January 2020
    • December 2019
    • November 2019
    • October 2019
    • September 2019
    • August 2019
    • July 2019
    • June 2019
    • May 2019
    • April 2019
    • March 2019

    Categories

    • News
    • Rugby

    Meta

    • Log in
    • Entries feed
    • Comments feed
    • WordPress.org
    ©2025 oumea.com | WordPress Theme by Superbthemes.com